Skip to content.
|
Skip to navigation
Site Map
Accessibility
Contact
Search Site
only in current section
Advanced Search…
Sections
Home
Documents
Africa Sites
CAMEROON: INTEGRATED FLOOD MANAGEMENT IN RIVER LOGONE FLOOD-PLAIN
Can This River Be Saved? Rethinking Cahora Bassa Could Make a Difference for Dam-Battered Zambezi
Acremane et al.- Managed Flood Releases from Reservoirs: Issues and Guidance
Hamerlynck and Duvail- MAURITANIA: MANAGED FLOOD RELEASES AND LIVELIHOODS - LOWER DELTA SENEGAL RIVER
Snoussi- Review of certain basic elements for the assessment of environmental flows in the Lower Moulouya
Smart- RIVER FLOW REGULATION AND WETLAND CONSERVATION IN A DRY COUNTRY: ICHKEUL, TUNISIA
Maingi and Marsh- Quantifying hydrologic impacts following dam construction along the Tana River, Kenya
Hamerlynck and Duvail- The rehabilitation of the delta of the Senegal River in Mauritania Fielding the ecosystem approach
Davies et al.- Cahora Bassa retrospective, 1974–1997: effects of flow regulation on the Lower Zambezi River
Hirji and Panella- EVOLVING POLICY REFORMS AND EXPERIENCES FOR ADDRESSING DOWNSTREAM IMPACTS IN WORLD BANK WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS
Hamerlynck and Duvail- The restoration of the Lower Delta of the Senegal River, Mauritania (1993-2004)
Duvail and Hamerlynck- Mitigation of negative ecological and socio-economic impacts of the Diama dam on the Senegal River Delta wetland (Mauritania), using a model based decision support system
Republic of Kenya- Expression of interest for provision of consultancy services for feasibility study and detailed design of the High Grand Falls multipurpose development project on Tana River
Tana River, Kenya- integrating downstream values into hydropower planning
Snoussi et al 2002- Effects of the construction of dams on the water and sediment fluxes of the Moulouya and the Sebou Rivers, Morocco
Abida et al. 2005- Flood routing of regulated flows in Medjerda River, Tunisia
Loth- The Return of Water- Restoringthe Waza Logone floodplain in Cameroon
Flow experiment case studies
Oconnor et al 2007 Barmah Millewah flow allocation.pdf
Rayner et al 2009 Small environmental flows- drought and the role of refugia.pdf
Rose - Bevitt 2003 Snowy River Benchmarking and Environmental Flow Monitoring project.pdf
Bednarek and Hart.2005.Modifying dam operations to restore rivers: ecological responses to Tennessee River dam mitigation
Wooldridge - Callahan 2000 The effects of a single freshwater release into the Kromme Estuary - 3 Estuarine zooplankton.pdf
Allan 2009 Using Adaptive Management.pdf
Bate - Adams 2000 The effects of a single freshwater release into the Kromme Estuary - 5 overview.pdf
Bevitt - Jones 2008 Water quality in the Snowy River before and after.pdf
Brooks et al 2007 Response of aquatic macroinvertebrates to the first environmental flow regime.pdf
Cambray 1991 THE EFFECTS ON FISH SPAWNING AND MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS OF IMPOUNDMENT WATER RELEASES.pdf
Cambray et al 1997 SPAWNING BEHAVIOUR AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE CLANWILLIAM YELLOWFISH.pdf
Gilligan - Williams 2008 Changes in fish assemblages after the first flow releases.pdf
King et al 2009 Adaptive management of an environmental watering event.pdf
Scharler - Baird 2000 The effects of a single freshwater release into the Kromme Estuary - 1 General description.pdf
Siebentritt et al 2004 EFFECTS OF AN ENHANCED FLOOD ON RIPARIAN PLANTS.pdf
Snow et al 2000 The effects of a single freshwater release into the Kromme Estuary - 2 Microalgal response.pdf
Strydom - whitfield 2000 The effects of a single freshwater release into the Kromme Estuary - 4 Larval fish.pdf
Tonkin et al 2008 Effects of flooding on recruitment and dispersal.pdf
Watts et al 2006 Responses of biofilms to cyclic releases.pdf
Rolls & Wilson EM 2010 Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Fish Assemblages Following an Artificially Extended Floodplain Inund.pdf
Effects of high-flow experiments from Glen Canyon Dam on abundance, growth, and survival rates of early life stages of rainbow trout in the Lees Ferry reach of the Colorado River
Short-term effects of the 2008 high-flow experiment on macroinvertebrates in the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona
2008 high-flow experiment at Glen Canyon Dam—morphologic response of eddy-deposited sandbars and associated aquatic backwater habitats along the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park
Lind et al 2007 MULTIPLE LINES OF EVIDENCE FOR THE BENEFICIAL EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS.pdf
Changes in the distribution and density of pink, chum, and Chinook salmon spawning in the upper Skagit River in response to flow management measures
Rate of biotic colonization flowing flow restoration below a diversion dam in the Bridge River, British Columbia
King et al.2009.Environmental flow enhances native fish spawning and recruitment in the Murray River, Australia
Layzer and Scott.2006.Restoration and colonization of freshwater mussels and fish in a southeastern United States tailwater
Experimental floods cause ecosystem regime shift in a regulated river
The effects of an environmental flow release on water quality in the hyporheic zone of the Hunter River, Australia
Is there enough sand? Evaluating the fate of Grand Canyon sandbars
Water quality response to a pulsed-flow event on the Mokelumne River, California
Fish community changes after minimum flow increase: testing quantitative predictions in the Rhoˆne River at Pierre-Be´nite, France
COMPARISON OF SEDIMENT-TRANSPORT AND BAR-RESPONSE RESULTS FROM THE 1996 AND 2004 CONTROLLED-FLOOD EXPERIMENTS ON THE COLORADO RIVER IN GRAND CANYON
Relation of inversely graded deposits to suspended-sediment grain-size evolution during the 1996 flood experiment in Grand Canyon
Streamflow and Sediment Data Collected to Determine the Effects of Low Summer Steady Flows and Habitat Maintenance Flows in 2000 on the Colorado River between Lees Ferry and Bright Angel Creek, Arizona
Influence of Glen Canyon Dam Operations on Downstream Sand Resources of the Colorado River in Grand Canyon
Ecosystem effects of environmental flows: modelling and experimental floods in a dryland river
Restoration of the Colorado River Ecosystem Using Planned Flooding
smokoroski et al.2007.HydroReview.doc
King et al.1998.Linked effects of dam-released floods and water temperature on spawning of the Clanwilliam yellowfish Barbus capensis
Effects of experimental flooding on riverine morphology, structure and riparian vegetation: The River Spöl, Swiss National Park
Effects of experimental floods on periphyton and stream metabolism below a high dam in the Swiss Alps (River Spöl)
Effects of a multi-year experimental flood regime on macroinvertebrates downstream of a reservoir
Longitudinal effects of experimental floods on stream benthos downstream from a large dam
Effects of experimental flooding on brown trout (Salmotrutta fario L.): The River Spöl, Swiss National Park
STREAM ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE TO MULTIPLE EXPERIMENTAL FLOODS FROM A RESERVOIR
Immediate and habitat-specific responses of macroinvertebrates to sequential, experimental floods
Ecological effects of a long-term flood program in a flow-regulated river
Managing river flows to restore floodplain forests
Recent Sediment Studies Refute Glen Canyon Dam Hypothesis
USFWS et al. 1999.pdf
Using artificial floods for restoring river integrity
Experimental floods in the River Spöl, Swiss National Park:Framework, objectives and design
Use of artificial flood events to demonstrate the invalidity of simple mixing models
Evaluating fine sediment mobilization and storage in a gravel-bed river using controlled reservoir releases
Auswirkung einer künstlichen Hochwasserwelle auf den fließgewässernahen Grundwasserleiter
Post-Flood Recovery of a Macroinvertebrate Community in a Regulated River: Resilience of an Anthropogenically Altered Ecosystem
Interim update: Flushing flows for the management of nuisance periphyton in the Opuha River, New Zealand
Flushing flows for control of nuisance periphyton growth in the Opuha-Opihi river system 2004-2006
2008 High-Flow Experiment at Glen Canyon Dam Benefits Colorado River Resources in Grand Canyon National Park
Sandbar response in Marble and Grand Canyons, Arizona, following the 2008 high-flow experiment on the Colorado River
Riparian vegetation response to the March 2008 short-duration, high-flow experiment—implications of timing and frequency of flood disturbance on nonnative plant establishment along the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam
Computation and analysis of the instantaneous-discharge for the Colorado River at Lees Ferry, Arizona: May 8, 1921, through September 30, 2000
Recovery of a warmwater fish assemblage after initiation of a minimum-flow release downstream from a hydroelectric dam
Response of river metabolism to restoration of flow in the Kissimmee River, Florida, U.S.A.
Owens River Gorge Restoration Project
hill and platts.1998.fisheries.pdf
toth et al.1998.biosci.pdf
King et al 2003 Monitoring Programs for Environmental Flows in Australia Literature Review.pdf
ryder - niller 2005 Setting goals and measuring success.pdf
2008 high-flow experiment at Glen Canyon Dam—morphologic response of eddy-deposited sandbars and associated aquatic backwater habitats along the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park
Watts 2007 Improving the ecological condition.pdf
Bestgen et al.2006.Response of the Green River Fish Community to Changes in Flow and Temperature Regimes from Flaming Gorge Damsince 1996 based on sampling conducted from 2002 to 2004
Vinson.2001.Long-term dynamics of an invertebrate assemblage downstream from a large dam
Montagna et al.2002.Effects of restored freshwater inflow on macrofauna and meiofauna in upper Rincon Bayou, Texas, USA
Ward et al.2002.Experimental river diversion for marsh enhancement
Tiffan et al.2009.Quantifying the behavioral response of spawning chum salmon to elevated discharges from Bonneville Dam, Columbia River, USA
Lundqvist et al.2008.Upstream passage problems for wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in a regulated river and its effect on the population
webb et al.2010.Detecting ecological responses to flow variation using Bayesian heirarchical models
Paragamian et al.2009.Kootenai River velocities, depth, and white sturgeon spawning site selection – a mystery unraveled?
Synthesis of juvenile salmonid passage studies at the Dalles Dam
connor et al.2003.Influence of Flow and Temperature on Survival of Wild Subyearling Fall Chinook Salmon in the Snake River
rust et al.2007.KOOTENAI RIVER WHITE STURGEON SPAWNING AND RECRUITMENT EVALUATION
rust and wakkinen.2009.KOOTENAI RIVER WHITE STURGEON SPAWNING AND RECRUITMENT EVALUATION
bisson et al.2000.Review of Studies of Fish Survival in Spill at The Dalles Dam
Eppard et al.2005.Passage Behavior and Survival for Hatchery Yearling Chinook Salmon at Ice Harbor Dam, 2004
kitcheyan and haines.2004.Evaluation of the Effects of Stage Fluctuations on Overwinter Survival and Movement of Young Colorado Pikeminnow in the Green River, Utah, 1999–2002
Arnkleiv et al.2007.Efforts to aid downstream migrating brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) kelts and smolts passing a hydroelectric dam and a spillway
Krien and sutter.2001.Use of artificial flood events to demonstrate the invalidity of simple mixing models
USBR.2009.Aspinall DEIS
Klimley et al.2007.Experimental and field studies to assess pulsed, water flow impacts on the behavior and distribution of fishes in the South Fork of the American River
Kraabol et al.2008.Emigration patterns among trout, Salmo trutta (L.), kelts and smolts through spillways in a hydroelectric dam
Kraabol.2006.Spawning biology of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in River Gudbrandsdalslgen below Hunderfossen Power Plant
muth et al.2000.Flaming Gorge Flow Recommendations
South Florida Environment Report.2010.Chapter12 Coastal Ecosystems
Rolls et al RRA RESPONSE BY FISH ASSEMBLAGES TO AN ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW RELEASE in the Hunter River.pdf
Swift.2009.St. Lucie water reservation
Ploskey et al.2007.Synthesis of biological research on juvenile fish passage and survival at Bonneville Dam through 2005
Sediment transport during three controlled-flood experiments on the Colorado River downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, with implications for eddy-sandbar deposition in Grand Canyon National Park
Floods and Sandbars in the Grand Canyon
Basal resources in backwaters of the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam—effects of discharge regimes and comparison with mainstem depositional environments
FISH RESPONSE TO MODIFIED FLOW REGIMES IN REGULATED RIVERS: RESEARCH METHODS, EFFECTS AND OPPORTUNITIES
Aeolian Reworking of Sandbars from the March 2008 Glen Canyon Dam High-Flow Experiment in Grand Canyon
Evaluating Effects of a High-Flow Event on Rainbow Trout Movement in Glen and Marble Canyons, Arizona, by Using Acoustic Telemetry and Relative Abundance Measures
FreemanandMarcinek2006_Fish assemblage responses to water withdrawals and water supply reservoirs in piedmont streams
MarchettiandMoyle2001_Effects of flow regime on fish assemblages in a regulated California stream
Woottonetal1996_Effects of disturbance on river food webs
Effects of Glen Canyon Dam discharges on water velocity and temperatures at the confluence of the Colorado and Little Colorado Rivers and implications for habitat for young-of-year humpback chub (Gila cypha)
GRAIN-SIZE EVOLUTION IN SUSPENDED SEDIMENT AND DEPOSITS FROM THE 2004 AND 2008 HIGH-FLOW EXPERIMENTS IN THE COLORADO RIVER THROUGH GRAND CANYON, ARIZONA
Effects of Experimental Ramping Rate on the Invertebrate Community of a Regulated River
Methodologies
McArthy et al 2006 Barmah Wetland System Environmental Monitoring Program-PartB.pdf
ryder - niller 2005 Setting goals and measuring success.pdf
A decision analysis of flow management experiments for Columbia River mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni) management
Using expert judgement and stakeholder values to evaluate adaptive management options
USGS Workshop on Scientific Aspects of a Long-Term Experimental Plan for Glen Canyon Dam, April 10–11, 2007, Flagstaff, Arizona
USGS Workshop on Scientific Aspects of a Long-Term Experimental Plan for Glen Canyon Dam, April 10-11, 2007, Flagstaff, Arizona.htm
Monk et al 2007 Selection of river flow indices for the assessment of hydroecological change
Stoddardetal2006_Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams the concept of reference condition
Theory and concepts
Active adaptive management of the Colorado River ecosystem below Glen Canyon dam, USA: using modeling and experimental design to resolve uncertainty in large-river management
Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam operations
Adaptive Management: The U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Guide
carpenter.1990a.ecology.pdf
carpenter.1990b.ecology.pdf
Walters and Holling.1990.Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing
Carpenter et al.1989.Randomized Intervention Analysis and the Interpretation of Whole-Ecosystem Experiments
Hurlbert.1984.Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Detecting biological responses to flow management: missed opportunities; future directions
COLLABORATIVE MANAGEMENT OF GLEN CANYON DAM: THE ELEVATION OF SOCIAL ENGINEERING OVER LAW
Beyond Conjecture: Learning about Ecosystem Management from the Glen Canyon Dam Experiment
Environmental flows from dams: the water framework directive
Kraabol et al.2009.Conserving iteroparous fish stocks in regulated rivers: the need for a broader perspective!
Poffetal2010_The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA) a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards
Acreman and Dunbar2004_Defining environmental river flow requirements - a review
Arthingtonetal2006_The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems
Poffetal1997_The natural flow regime a paradigm for river conservation and restoration
Tharme2003_A global perspective on environmental flow assessment
Overviews and reviews
Watts 2007 Improving the ecological condition.pdf
Fish response to modified flow regimes in regulated rivers: research methods, effects, and opportunities
Mitigating the effect of high-head dams on the Columbia River, USA: experience from the trenches
The Nature Conservancy Flow Restoration Data Base
Water Resources and Environment.Technical Note C.3.Environmental Flows:Flood Flows
How run-of-river operation affects hydropower generation and value
King et al 2003 Monitoring Programs for Environmental Flows in Australia Literature Review.pdf
Williams et al.2005.Effects of the Federal Columbia River Power System on Salmonid Populations
Ferguson et al.2005.Passage of adult and juvenile salmonids through Federal Columbia River Power System dams
Columbia River Salmon Recovery Hydro Module.2009
PoffandZimmerman2010_Ecological responses to altered flow regimes a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows
Background materials
The state of the Colorado River ecosystem in Grand Canyon: Lessons from 10 years of adaptive ecosystem management
On the relationship between hydrographs and chemographs
River and Wetland restoration. Lessons from Japan
DYNAMICS OF RIVER FISH POPULATIONS IN RESPONSE TO HYDROLOGICAL CONDITIONS: A SIMULATION STUDY
McArthy et al 2006 Barmah Wetland System Environmental Monitoring Program-PartB.pdf
Oconnor et al 2007 Barmah Millewah flow allocation.pdf
Rayner et al 2009 Small environmental flows- drought and the role of refugia.pdf
Natural or plot scale flow experiments
Invertebrate and microbial responses to inundation in an ephemeral river reach in New Zealand: effects of preceding dry periods
Drift patterns of particulate matter and organisms during artificial high
An artificial flood to determine the hydrological networks contribution to phosphorus exports in a small rural watershed
Nielsen et al.2002.THE INFLUENCE OF SEASONALITY AND DURATION OF FLOODING ON ZOOPLANKTON IN EXPERIMENTAL BILLABONGS
Ellis et al.1999.Influence of experimental flooding on litter dynamics in a Rio Grande riparian forest, New Mexico
Dewson et al.2007.Stream ecosystem functioning under reduced flow conditions
Rader et al.2007.Post-flood recovery of a macroinvertebrate community in a regulated river: resilience of an anthropogencially altered ecosystem
TornesandSabater2010_Variable discharge alters habitat suitability for benthic algae and cyanobacteria in a forested Mediterranian stream
HolomuzkiandBiggs1999_Distributional responses to flow disturbance by a stream-dwelling snail
Brown2007_Habitat heterogeneity and disturbance influence patterns of community temporal variability in a small temperate stream
Fauschetal2001_Flood disturbance regimes influence rainbow trout invasion success among five holarctic regions
Lancaster1999_Small scale movements of lotic macroinvertebrates with variations in flow
Vignieri2010_The genetic effects of ecological disturbance flooding in jumping mice
Data
Flow Experiment Site Database
Flow Treatments Database
Meetings
Discuss
Help!
Search Site
Advanced Search…
Personal tools
Log in
You are here:
Home
→
Data
→
Flow Treatments Database
Navigation
Documents
Data
Flow Experiment Site Database
Flow Treatments Database
Meetings
Discuss
Log in
Login Name
Password
Remember me.
Cookies are not enabled. You must enable cookies before you can log in.
Forgot your password?
Info
Flow Treatments Database
Facility Name
(Required)
This list is automatically generated based on the entries to the Site Database.
Alamo Dam
Ross-Diablo-Gorge Dam
Navajo Dam
Burrendong Dam
Test
Trinity Dam
Test
test
Green River Lake Dam (KY)
Oconto Falls Hydroeletric Project
Thurmond Dam
Thurmond Dam
Punt dal Gall
Opuha Dam
Opuha Dam
Fort Sumner Dam
Winter Dam
Ferrells Bridge
Remmel Dam
Steephill Falls Dam
Burrendong Dam
Dartmouth Dam
Hume Dam
Mowamba River Aqueduct
Glenbawn Dam
Rocklands Dam
Lake Victoria water storage
Beervlei Dam
Clanwilliam Dam
Mpofu (Impofu) Dam
Libby Dam
Wesley Seale Dam
Multiple offstream storages in upper Condamine-Balonne catchment
Lostock Dam
Glen Canyon Dam
Derby Dam
Oldman Dam
Camanche Dam
Flaming Gorge Dam
Thurlow Dam
Pierre-Benite Dam
Terzaghi Dam
Douglas Dam
Santeetlah Dam
S-65
Long Valley Dam
John Day Dam
The Dalles Dam
Jindabyne Dam
Stornorrfors Power Plant
Multiple reservoirs in Grampians
Dworshak Dam
Burrinjuck Dam
Mill race
Chili Bar Dam
Aspinall Unit (Blue Mesa, Morrow Point, Crystal reservoirs)
Lake Eppalock
St. Mary Dam
Bonneville Dam
Gordy Rd. bridge and Lake Okeechobee
Blue Ridge Dam
Chatuge Dam
Cherokee Dam
Norris Dam
Nottely Dam
South Holston Dam
Tims Ford Dam
Jordan Dam
Harris Dam
Sinclair Dam
Friant Dam
Cochiti Dam
Rangipo Dam
Maga Dam
Hunderfossen Power Plant
Ice Harbor Dam
Dworshak Dam
Bradbury Dam
Bradbury Dam
Bradbury Dam
Challawa Gorge and Tiga Dam
Whiskeytown Dam
Oak Grove Hydrpoelectric Project
Pongolapoort Dam
Kielder Dam
Roanoke Rapids Dam
Tiber Dam
Buffalo Bill Dam
Cotter Dam
Middle Dam
Santee-Cooper Rediversion project
Type of flow treatment
Indicate the hydrologic type of experimental treatment that was applied. High flows include releases of less than one day to weeks when flows are elevated to simulate storm events, snowmelt, or floods. Minimum low flows refer to releases during dry periods. Other minimum scheduled flows refer to releases scheduled for specific times of years typically targeting specific life-stages of species of interest (for example, spawning and incubation flows intended to maintain wetted area in the river channel). Within-day restrictions refers to limits on the daily range in releases, ramping rates, and their timing intended to mitigation the effects of rapid changes in dam releases due to hydropower peaking, diversions, or changes in reservoir storage. Diviersion indicates that the treatment was applied by changes at a diversion structure. Groundwater pumping indicates that the treatments were a result of changes in groundwater pumping.
High flow release
Minimum low flow
Seasonal minimum flow
Within-day restrictions
Groundwater pumping
Diversion
Dates of treatments
Enter the dates that water was released, not diverted, or not pumped using the four-digit year followed by two digit month. For example, February 2003 would be entered as 200302. For discrete events (e.g., a high flow release), only the start date is needed. For longer treatments, enter the start and end dates. Multiple treatments can be entered using multiple lines. Note if there was monitoring of each treatment individually and any comments about each.
Start date (YYYYMM)
End date (YYYYMM)
Was this treatment monitored individually? (YES or NO)
Comment about treatment
Add new row
Control
Yes
No
Is there pre-treatment data?
Paired system?
Upstream / Downstream?
Ecological Responses monitored
Biological responses by taxonomic groups
check all boxes that apply
Fish
Aquatic invertebrates
Terrestrial invertebrates
Riparian vegetation
Aquatic vegetation
Birds
Other vertebrate
Other responses
Nutrients/biogeochemistry
Sediment transport
Temperature
Geomorphology/habitat structure
Other physical parameters
Management
desired outcomes
Primary, secondary, teriary reasons for the flow event
Strategies
Yes
No
Claim to be adaptive management?
Did management strategies "change" in response to the flow experiment?
Powered by Plone
Valid XHTML
Valid CSS
Section 508
WCAG