Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home Discuss General discussion on the course Interest Networks

Interest Networks

Up to General discussion on the course
  • Interest Networks

    Posted by heffernan at August 31. 2010
    Networks of interests and Effects of Sust Sci Seminar participation
     
    Motivation and Question
     
    In the workshop, we discussed how to identify and represent the specific interests of SustSci seminar participants on the Participant webpage.  The assertion arose that pre-cast key words to identify potential working groups or even like-minded people just don´t work in this interdisciplinary field.    This is a testable hypothesis.
     
    Applying cluster analysis and network analysis to  self-identifying keywords , what structures emerge?  Are there clear clusters? Are some topics more highly connected than others?  Are there some notable gaps or non-overlapping areas between clusters?
     
    How does this structure compare to the structure that emerges when participants are asked to check appropriate items on a pre-cast list of keywords?
     
    How do course discussions look when analyzed as networks?
     
    What are the relationships between initial structures and networks pursued or collaborations initiated as a result of seminar activities?
     
     
     
    Approach
     
    Use cluster & network analysis to analyze participants´ self-identifying and pre-cast keywords.
     
    Analyze patterns of conversation responses & threads in seminar discussions
     
    Analyze patterns of self-organization into ´working groups´ or other that emerge.
     
    Analyze patterns of interactions among faculty, and maybe some vertical, temporal network connections between faculty and participants?
     
    • Re: Interest Networks

      Posted by wclark at September 13. 2010

      I would be interested in seeing the results of such an analysis.  But I would also like to know whether it would be useful for each of us to post in a searchable place and format a paragraph on our interests, a cv, and a list of publications or presentations.  Thoughts?

       

      Previously Jim Heffernan wrote:

      Networks of interests and Effects of Sust Sci Seminar participation
       
      Motivation and Question
       
      In the workshop, we discussed how to identify and represent the specific interests of SustSci seminar participants on the Participant webpage.  The assertion arose that pre-cast key words to identify potential working groups or even like-minded people just don´t work in this interdisciplinary field.    This is a testable hypothesis.
       
      Applying cluster analysis and network analysis to  self-identifying keywords , what structures emerge?  Are there clear clusters? Are some topics more highly connected than others?  Are there some notable gaps or non-overlapping areas between clusters?
       
      How does this structure compare to the structure that emerges when participants are asked to check appropriate items on a pre-cast list of keywords?
       
      How do course discussions look when analyzed as networks?
       
      What are the relationships between initial structures and networks pursued or collaborations initiated as a result of seminar activities?
       
       
       
      Approach
       
      Use cluster & network analysis to analyze participants´ self-identifying and pre-cast keywords.
       
      Analyze patterns of conversation responses & threads in seminar discussions
       
      Analyze patterns of self-organization into ´working groups´ or other that emerge.
       
      Analyze patterns of interactions among faculty, and maybe some vertical, temporal network connections between faculty and participants?
       

       

      • Re: Interest Networks

        Posted by egking at September 13. 2010

        The idea for this study arose as a way to analyze the network dynamics that emerge among participants.  Indeed, in terms of the proposed analysis, the more searchable information on the website, the better.

        At the planning workshop, NCEAS web developer Shaun went away with a lot of requests, including many specifics about how we'd like participant information to be searchable.   The topic received well over 1/2 hour of discussion.  Someone can correct me if I'm off, but I thought Shaun planned to first get the form-entered information searchable, then will work on making it possible to search even within attached pdfs of CVs and publications.  Right now, the search function at the upper right seems to search everything, including attached pdfs and docs, EXCEPT participant bios.  Odd. 

        But with a bit more time, if all goes as planned, the information you've already posted about yourself will indeed be searchable from the search function at the top of each page. 

         

        Previously William Clark wrote:

        I would be interested in seeing the results of such an analysis.  But I would also like to know whether it would be useful for each of us to post in a searchable place and format a paragraph on our interests, a cv, and a list of publications or presentations.  Thoughts?

         


         

    • Re: Interest Networks

      Posted by gziv at September 14. 2010

      Previously Jim Heffernan wrote:

      Applying cluster analysis and network analysis to  self-identifying keywords , what structures emerge?  Are there clear clusters? Are some topics more highly connected than others?  Are there some notable gaps or non-overlapping areas between clusters?
       
      Such analysis would indeed be interesting, but there's a technical problem that must be solved first. The registration form limits each of the 3 keywords to 20 letters, alltough in the user profile you can edit those and extend them beyond 20 letters. For example, I could not write 'Sustainable Development' because it is beyond 20 characters...
      • Re: Interest Networks

        Posted by egking at September 14. 2010

        Hello Guy,

        Re website registration: You make a good point that 20 characters seems very short for interdisciplinary researchers!  I'll email our already heavily-tasked web designer and see if it's not too late to extend the size of those fields.  Sustainable development is perhaps a term that many participants would like to enter!

        As for the study of networks, those notes are, as you can tell, quite preliminary ideas.  We talked about developing a separate questionnaire, which asks participants to identify themselves with ~30-40 terms on a prepared list.  We only spent about 3 minutes discussing ways that the self-identifying terms might be clustered.  So lots of room for development of methodologies there!  I am hoping that interested seminar participants will step into the conversation and form a team that's keen to develop and perform this analysis.  

        -Lizzie

         

        Previously Guy Ziv wrote:

        Applying cluster analysis and network analysis to  self-identifying keywords , what structures emerge?  Are there clear clusters? Are some topics more highly connected than others?  Are there some notable gaps or non-overlapping areas between clusters?
         
        Such analysis would indeed be interesting, but there's a technical problem that must be solved first. The registration form limits each of the 3 keywords to 20 letters, alltough in the user profile you can edit those and extend them beyond 20 letters. For example, I could not write 'Sustainable Development' because it is beyond 20 characters...

         

Powered by Ploneboard